RJ and Makay

Thursday, May 24th

Open Positions | Careers | Privacy Policy | Bookmark | FAQ | Contact Us  

You are here: Tags Monster.com
http://www.rjandmakay.com/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/537321header_1.jpg http://www.rjandmakay.com/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/963038header_2.jpg http://www.rjandmakay.com/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/981787header_3.jpg http://www.rjandmakay.com/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/923473header_4.jpg

RJ & Makay

Our view of news, events and human capital trends in the financial services industry.
Tags >> Monster.com

Company sites, not job boards, work best for jobseekers

Posted by RJ and Makay on Apr 04, 2011

>> Read More RJ & Makay Blog Posts

Company sites, not job boards, work best for jobseekersTo maximize your chances of getting a job, it's more effective to apply directly through company websites than social media or job boards. That's what job candidate tracker Jobs2web found when it analyzed 1.3 million applications and 26,000 hires in 2010.

According to the analysis, companies end up perusing 219 applications per job from candidates responding to posts on major board such as Monster.com or CareerBuilder before finding someone to hire. However, they only have to read 33 applications per hire from job seekers who apply on the company's own career site and 32 per hire when candidates type the job they're looking for into a search engine.